THE RULES

Ten short rules for the forum. They sit underneath the Charter and are applied openly by members, never by a staff moderator or hidden algorithm.

  1. 01

    Open a thread with a question, not a verdict

    A thread titled as a conclusion invites cheering. A thread that asks something real invites thinking. Say what you believe and say what would change your mind.

    Charter article 01 · good faith

  2. 02

    Upvote reasoning, not your own side

    An upvote here means the reply moved the argument forward. Upvoting only what flatters you turns the forum into a scoreboard, and a scoreboard kills honest thinking.

    Charter article 02 · good faith

  3. 03

    Answer the strongest version

    Reply to the best reading of what someone said, not the weakest. If you have to distort it to beat it, you haven't beaten it.

    Charter article 02 · good faith

  4. 04

    Own your words

    One real person, one account, one public voice. Use your chosen public name, but no throwaways, sock puppets or manufactured consensus.

    Charter article 11 · the lines

  5. 05

    No hate speech, no incitement

    Argue with anyone about anything. Do not attack people for who they are, and never call for harm. The pen is mightier than the sword — peaceful, lawful pressure is the route that actually wins.

    Charter article 13 · the lines

  6. 06

    Disagree in public, resolve in public

    No quiet deletions of an argument you lost, no editing history to win. Change your mind out loud; it is the most persuasive thing anyone does here.

    Charter article 06 · no rulers

  7. 07

    No moderators — juries

    Staff do not decide what may be said. A randomly drawn jury judges alleged conduct breaches, not opinions. Evidence, votes and completed reasoning are transparent. Three upheld strikes remove an account.

    Charter article 18 · peer justice

  8. 08

    Serve when you are called

    Miss three jury calls in a row and you are out of the pool for a month. Do it again and it is six months. A third time and you never sit on a jury here again.

    Charter article 19 · peer justice

  9. 09

    Evidence beats volume

    Popularity is not proof. Bring evidence and reasoning. The loudest side does not win merely by being loud.

    Charter article 21 · peer justice

  10. 10

    One appeal, on proper grounds

    A verdict may be reviewed once for procedural error, undisclosed conflict, new evidence or material mistake. A fresh jury decides. Disliking the outcome is not grounds.

    Charter article 20 · peer justice

The full Charter has the twenty-two articles these rules rest on.